spooktastic-aradia:

k-rbie:

trans-corvo:

trashgender-neurotica:

bayrad:

everyone stop reblogging the chains that don’t include the trans flag challenge

mosticonicposts:

serotnin:

me after being diagnosed w sleepy bitch disease

certified iconic post

jediscenes:

October 21st, 1956 - December 27th, 2016

abracafuckko:

I think one of my absolute favourite things about TAZ is that Griffin got to write a campaign in which the three free agents, the three moving parts that he relied on to make his story work, were the three people he knows best in the whole universe. People talk about Griffin’s story being ‘on rails’ but it’s not. It’s just that - unlike most DMs - Griffin can predict his family’s behaviour in advance in a way most people couldn’t hope to do. If he were playing with a different group, the story never would have turned out the way it did, but because he knows his family, he could fairly accurately predict the big decisions.

He writes a voidfish into the story, because he knows his brother is kind to animals, knows he’d never leave a sentient baby jellyfish on a planet about to get eaten, not even narratively. He’s not writing Travis into a corner, Travis would never consider doing anything else. He writes Taako a sister - a best friend, a twin, a soul mate - because he knows that Justin is a big brother to his very core, knows that his instincts will always fall in line with sibling loyalty and devotion, even when he’s playing an aloof elf who doesn’t care about anyone. He writes his dad into the trickiest position of them all - facing true horror, sitting across the table from the end of the world - and he knows that his father will respond with compromise and understanding, with love and joy and compassion, because he’s seen that grace in his father his whole life. Griffin was betting on those qualities that he already knew his family possessed, and it was the safest bet he ever made! Because they were amazing, and he always knew they would be.

frustrationinexcelsis:

ketunperse:

ketunperse:

you ever look at certain american christmas movies and wonder how, seemingly, not a single person during the whole production bothered to look up what a reindeer is? like is there a single piece of animated rudolph the red-nosed reindeer media where rudolph is depicted as a reindeer and not a white-tailed deer?

red nose just because :)

I was aware that almost every depiction of mistletoe in Christmas movies uses holly instead, but I only just realized that almost every Christmas reindeer is actually a white-tailed deer while reading this post.

monsterlovingman:

yeetersofthelostcities:

booty-voyages:

Someone: Star Trek is set in the future, why would disabilities exist?
me, a disabled trekkie remembering that tng had a disabled character in the main cast, had an episode about a ‘genetic utopia’ in which that disabled character finds a solution to their problem BECAUSE he’s disabled, and that star trek has shown multiple people with some kind of disability: in the grand future, disabilities are ACCOMMODATED for, not erased.

some dumb bitch: in star trek all the disabilities would’ve either been cured at birth or wiped out long ago

me, thinking about geordi, julian, tilly, barclay, etc: oh, haven’t you heard?

Ableists: why wouldn’t they cure disabilities at birth?

Me, knows that eugenics is strictly against the code of the United Federation Of Planets: lol fake nerd boy